Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target
Date: 2009-06-06 19:06:30
Message-ID: 4A2ABE36.1040203@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark,

> On the DL380 GB system, where I'm using a lot more drives the Jignesh,
> I see a performance change of under 5%. 15651.14 notpm vs 16333.32
> notpm. And this is after a bit of tuning, not sure how much the out
> of the box experience changes on this system.

Well, Jignesh and I identified two things which we think are "special"
about DBT2: (1) it uses C stored procedures, and (2) we don't think it
uses prepared plans.

I've been unable to reproduce any performance drop using pgbench.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2009-06-06 19:23:31 Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment]
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-06-06 18:54:11 Re: pg_migrator issue with contrib