| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |
| Date: | 2009-05-28 01:18:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4A1DA009.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm curious as to what is different about these vs all the other
> tags I've ever done, both before, and after ...
Any chance you tagged, changes were committed, and you then tagged
files from such a later commit as part of the release, or moved the
tag to the later commit? Those are perfectly reasonable things to do
under the CVS philosophy, and not in line with the philosophy of some
of the other products.
If there's a chance you did that on a couple beta releases in that
time frame, and on no others, that might explain it.
One product's flexibility is another product's "broken".
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-28 01:24:33 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2009-05-28 01:09:10 | Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |