Re: pg_class and enum types

From: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class and enum types
Date: 2009-05-24 21:32:40
Message-ID: 4A19BCF8.50102@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> I was wondering why there is no pg_class record for the enum types.
>> Do we treat the enum types differently?
>>
>
> Why do you think we should? What would the record look like?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
I am not implying whether we should or we should not. I was just
looking for the logic behind it.
Re-reading what I just wrote with your reply gives me hint.

Thanx.

--
Regards,
Gevik

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Tolley 2009-05-24 21:37:53 Re: generic options for explain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-24 21:29:45 Re: pg_class and enum types