Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Date: 2009-05-06 17:18:52
Message-ID: 4A01C67C.5090902@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> I think changeable regex flavors turned out to be a bad idea. They can
>> wreak all sorts of havoc. You change the setting, SIGHUP, and suddenly
>> your application fails to work as expected. Maybe we should make that
>> setting PGC_POSTMASTER (or just get rid of it?), and provide was to pass
>> flags to change the flavor for particular operations (this is easy for
>> function-based stuff but not so easy for operators). That way it
>> doesn't intrude in stuff like cached plans and so on.
>
> Maybe so. I think it was originally intended mostly as a
> backwards-compatibility measure when we added the support for ARE
> flavor. It's pretty likely that no one changes the flavor setting
> in practice anymore. If we just locked it down as "advanced always"
> then we could simplify the documentation by a measurable amount ...

yeah I don't recall a single incident in the last few years that
required playing with the regex flavours....

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-06 18:03:14 Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-05-06 17:15:07 Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps