Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Attached patch fixes this in my testcase. Can anybody spot something
>> wrong with it?
>
> It depends on tolower(), which is going to have LC_CTYPE-dependent
> behavior, which is surely wrong?
Not sure, really :) That's the encoding we'd get the paths in in the
first place, is it not?
Or are you just saying we should be using pg_tolower()? (which I forgot
about yet again)
//Magnus