| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Date: | 2009-03-01 07:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 49AA3774.4090801@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii,
>> Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities
>
> Good
>
>> unless necessary.
>
> That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
While Simon stated it a bit strongly, I think it's important that you
alert people if you think you have to remove existing features in order
to make easy standby possible. It's possible that features which seem
trivial to you are used extensively by people with particular failover
requirements.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-03-01 10:12:13 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2009-03-01 07:09:23 | Re: regression test crashes at tsearch |