Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Date: 2009-02-19 16:06:35
Message-ID: 499D838B.3060403@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> (I'm unconvinced that it is dead code, but even if it is it'd be folly
> to remove it.)

Agreed, it's a useful safeguard, even it it's a "can't happen" scenario.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-19 16:20:22 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-19 16:01:45 Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual