| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, bogdan(at)omnidatagrup(dot)ro, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security |
| Date: | 2009-02-18 00:31:19 |
| Message-ID: | 499B56D7.7040408@ak.jp.nec.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
>> All,
>>
>> I thought we'd agreed to compromise on having SE without row-level in 8.4,
>> and working on SE with row-level in 8.5. Why are we revisiting this
>> argument? 8.4 is *already* late; arguing further about the terms of SE
>> simply risk us being forced to reject it entirely.
>>
>
> I absolutely agree. It nonsense open again and again closed question.
I also agree. What we should do now is to make progress the proposed
feature for v8.4, not a upcoming feature.
BogDan,
As I noted before, I can understand your requirement, but we already
decided to postpone a part of features within originally proposed,
because we're paying effort to develop v8.4 within reasonable schedule.
I'd like you to guess who wanted the row-level stuff to be merged most.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-18 01:34:45 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4660: float functions return -0 |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2009-02-17 23:56:47 | regression test crashes at tsearch |