Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-02-13 14:17:13
Message-ID: 499580E9.8030406@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I am not in love with the idea of using PQinitSSL(SOME_MAGIC_VALUE)
>>
>> The issue I see is the inability to toggle crypto initialization. I
>> think crypto init and ssl init are 2 different things. Thus, I
>> proposed the below:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-02/msg00488.php
>
> If that can be made transparent to existing apps, I'm all for it.
>
> ...Robert
>

Should I create a patch implementing the PQinitCrypto idea?

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-02-13 14:21:23 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous Message Joshua Brindle 2009-02-13 14:07:53 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1530)