Re: DISCARD ALL failing to acquire locks on pg_listen

From: Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DISCARD ALL failing to acquire locks on pg_listen
Date: 2009-02-11 16:47:48
Message-ID: 49930134.4020609@beccati.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

>> Given I was using 8.3, it seemed quite right to set the reset statement
>> to "ABORT; DISCARD ALL". Everything works fine, until a load spike
>> happens and pgpool-II reset queries start to lag behind, with DISCARD
>> ALL failing to acquire an exclusive locks on the pg_listen system table,
>> although the application isn't using any LISTEN/NOTIFY. The reason was
>> not obvious to me, but looking at the man page explained a lot: DISCARD
>> ALL also performs an "UNLISTEN *".
>
> Seems like we could/should fix UNLISTEN * to not do anything if it is
> known that the current backend never did any LISTENs.

Ok, I'll take sometime tonight to give my patch a try and eventually
submit it.

Cheers

--
Matteo Beccati

OpenX - http://www.openx.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-02-11 16:50:32 Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2009-02-11 16:44:33 Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins