Re: add_path optimization

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: add_path optimization
Date: 2009-02-03 14:15:12
Message-ID: 4987FD10.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In fact, the only reason to care whether there is any data in the DB
> *at all* is that you need some realistic content in pg_statistic.
> So it should be possible to set up a planner test DB with very
little
> data bulk, which would surely make testing a lot less painful.

Can you suggest a query (or queries) which, together with a schema
dump, would give you enough to duplicate my results?

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-02-03 14:28:02 Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-03 14:14:16 Re: Hot Standby (v9d)