From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements |
Date: | 2002-07-23 15:34:39 |
Message-ID: | 4984.1027438479@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) writes:
> Regarding the syntax for EXECUTE, it occurs to me that it could be made
> to be more similar to the PREPARE syntax -- i.e.
> PREPARE foo(text, int) AS ...;
> EXECUTE foo('a', 1);
> (rather than EXECUTE USING -- the effect being that prepared statements
> now look more like function calls on a syntactical level, which I think
> is okay.)
Hmm, maybe *too* much like a function call. Is there any risk of a
conflict with syntax that we might want to use to invoke stored
procedures? If not, this is fine with me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-23 15:42:37 | Re: [PATCHES] Demo patch for DROP COLUMN |
Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-07-23 14:56:44 | Re: RAMDISK |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-23 15:42:37 | Re: [PATCHES] Demo patch for DROP COLUMN |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-23 01:35:48 | Re: [PATCHES] Demo patch for DROP COLUMN |