Re: cluster_name and update_process_title documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cluster_name and update_process_title documentation
Date: 2015-09-25 14:49:35
Message-ID: 4983.1443192575@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The related settings cluster_name and update_process_title have somehow
> ended up at opposite corners of the documentation and sample files. I
> propose to group them together in a new "Process Title" section, as in
> the attached patch.

I think you missed some places that need to be updated to add a new
config_group value; at least guc.c's config_group_names[] array, and
there might be other places. But +1 for the concept.

(I wonder if we couldn't add a static assert to catch this class of
error in the future.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2015-09-25 14:59:22 Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2015-09-25 14:20:30 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an O(N^2) problem in foreign key references.