From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgtune: postgresql.conf wizard |
Date: | 2009-01-26 19:42:55 |
Message-ID: | 497E123F.3060207@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg,
> Things I was hoping for some input on:
> -Using default_stats_target=100 doesn't seem controversial anymore,
> which makes we wonder if it makes sense to restore the original DW
> suggestion of 400 Josh suggested?
I'm going to back off from this. Following our discussion, I did some
testing on DWs belonging to my clients. The amount of time required to
ANALYZE 20m rows of a large text field at 400 is significant, as is the
bulk-out of the stats table.
Instead, I'm writing a script which increases stats for all *indexed*
columns under a named size to a user-specified level. When it's ready,
I'll add it to pgTune.
So for DW, go for 100. Not 400, though.
--Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-01-26 19:48:00 | Re: autovacuum, reloptions, and hardcoded pg_class tupdesc |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-26 19:36:51 | Re: 8.4 release planning |