| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Date: | 2009-01-23 22:52:54 |
| Message-ID: | 497A4A46.20809@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bernd,
> To be honest: I'm disappointed. If it tooks only a few steps to identify
> those (obviously important) issues, i get the opinion that there's very
> few motivating interest in this functionality (And yes, i'm annoyed
> about myself to not consider those operator issues).
Well, that *is* the problem with getting your patch into the last
commitfest, and why I tried to get everyone to submit earlier. You only
have to miss one difficult problem to miss the release.
If it makes you feel any better, I certainly didn't think of the
operator issue, and neither did Robert.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-01-23 23:02:55 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-01-23 22:43:47 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-23 22:54:02 | Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-01-23 22:43:47 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |