| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 17:15:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4978A9A2.6060906@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Chernow wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
>>> I can try. Where should this be documented? ISTM that the best
>>> place is at the top of "30.1 Database Connection Control Functions",
>>> since the issue pertains to any connect/disconnect function. Does
>>> that sound correct? Should it be a warning or just regular text?
>>
>> Minor platform-specific performance nits are not that important. Think
>> "footnote", not "warning at the top of the page".
>>
> Its a footnote at the end of the first paragraph in 30.1.
Fixed a few things.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| wsa.patch | text/plain | 2.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-22 17:27:55 | pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2009-01-22 16:54:37 | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |