Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Date: 2009-01-19 19:29:25
Message-ID: 4974D495.8070809@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> We could have gone with a more elegant init/uninit solution but there is
> a history of slow upstream adoption of libpq API changes.
>
>

If that's the case, adding a connectdb option seems like a good
alternative. Orignally suggested here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01358.php

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-19 19:32:46 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-19 19:20:18 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed