> I agree, though I've always wondered if a better solution would be for Dan to
> rename his conference as PGCan (which is a play on BSDCan, his other
> conference, and would provide even more brand identity).
Well, right now, pgCon is the primary conference for PostgreSQL hackers.
Renaming it to pgCan would be tantamount to giving up that status.
That's not an issue with BSDCan because there's no significant BSD US
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2009-01-12 20:12:03|
|Subject: PgUS 2008 end of year summary|
|Previous:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2009-01-12 17:44:06|
|Subject: Re: PGCon brand|