Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-19 09:04:25
Message-ID: 494B6399.3090001@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On a related but different point: We don't need an interlock between
> dirty buffers and WAL during recovery because the WAL has already been
> written.

Assuming the WAL has also been fsync'd.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-19 09:22:12 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-12-19 08:59:31 Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch