| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PiTR and other architectures.... |
| Date: | 2008-12-03 00:02:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4935CCAA.1030206@rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> But, as Simon pointed out, is it really worth the risk? PITR is closer
> to a physical process, and it's probably wise to just assume it's not
> portable.
>
Yeah...I am getting that impression ;-). From this I will assume we need:
- same OS (and OS minor version?)
- same CPU architecture
I was hoping it was a simple set of requirements, but that's life.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 03 5330 3171 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
http://www.rhyme.com.au <http://www.rhyme.com.au/>
| / \|
| --________--
GPG key available upon request. | /
|/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-03 00:52:41 | Re: pg_stat_all_tables vs NULLs |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-12-02 23:44:28 | Re: PiTR and other architectures.... |