Re: libpq-events windows gotcha

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq-events windows gotcha
Date: 2008-11-15 03:44:37
Message-ID: 491E45A5.3080301@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
>>> On the whole I vote for #4 out of these.
>
>> I attached a patch for the docs. Its documented as a NOTE to the
>> PGEventProc.
>
> Applied, but I editorialized on the wording a bit. Let me know if you
> think this is wrong ...
>
>

It's correct, the wording is clearer now. I wasn't aware there was a caution
tag, which is better than using <note>.

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-11-15 05:56:23 Re: "ORDER BY" clause prevents "UPDATE WHERE CURRENT OF"
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-11-15 03:43:49 Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements