| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq with ssl vs psql without |
| Date: | 2008-11-11 15:04:40 |
| Message-ID: | 49199F08.8050302@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I just noticed that if you have libpq with SSL support, but psql
>> without, we don't print any SSL information at all. Would it be
>> worthwhile to have it print that SSL is in use, even if we can't print
>> the details about the connection?
>
> I think the use-case for this is nonexistent, but you can still sell the
> change on the grounds of reducing the number of #ifdefs.
>
> It might be worth putting a comment in there, because people will wonder
> what the heck this is about.
>
> /* this can only happen if libpq has SSL support and psql doesn't */
Done.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-11-11 15:12:49 | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Previous Message | Helio Campos Mello de Andrade | 2008-11-11 15:00:51 | Re: Very slow queries w/ NOT IN preparation (seems like a bug, test case) |