| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User defined I/O conversion casts |
| Date: | 2008-10-30 13:31:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4909B722.9020404@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(Resurrecting an old thread.)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Patch attached. I'm using a magic OID "1" in pg_cast.castfunc field to
>> mark these extra I/O conversion casts.
>
> Ugh. That's really unacceptable (doesn't it make the oidjoins
> regression test fail?),
Yeah, a magical OID clearly has some issues. A new field in pg_cast is
the obvious alternative. How about adding a "castmethod" char field,
with values:
b = binary-compatible cast (CREATE CAST ... WITHOUT FUNCTION)
i = I/O coercion cast (the new beast, CREATE CAST ... WITH INOUT)
f = use cast function specified in castfunc field.
castfunc is 0 for methods b and i.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-30 13:37:37 | Re: User defined I/O conversion casts |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-30 13:29:33 | Re: Optimizing COPY |