Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Date: 2008-10-15 18:10:56
Message-ID: 48F63230.1070208@tocr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the subtext there is that the Linux kernel hackers hate the SysV
> IPC APIs and wish they'd go away. They are presently constrained from
> removing 'em by their desire for POSIX compliance, but you won't get
> them to make any changes that might result in those APIs becoming more
> widely used :-(
>
> Mind you, I find the SysV APIs uselessly baroque too, but there is one
> feature that we have to have that is not in mmap(): the ability to
> detect other processes attached to a shmem block.

Didn't we solve this problem on Windows? Can we do a similar thing in
Unix and get ride of the SysV stuff?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-15 18:15:10 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Previous Message Andrus 2008-10-15 18:07:28 Re: Optimizing projections containing unused columns

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-15 18:15:10 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-10-15 17:22:14 Re: Backup strategies