| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Charlie Savage <cfis(at)savagexi(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED |
| Date: | 2008-10-14 13:33:21 |
| Message-ID: | 48F49FA1.2030806@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> Well - building your own Postgres 8.3 on Windows using MingW appears broken.
>> Not sure how many people fall into that category, but its seems like a
>> fairly major issue.
>>
>
> Very few people build their own Postgres on Windows, because it's not
> exactly straightforward to do because of all the dependencies.
>
>
IMNSHO, it is not acceptable to leave CVS for any significant period in
a state where someone can't run "make check" by hand, and you certainly
can't assume that no-one will want to do so.
I can confirm that commenting out '+ 18' from the last loop of the
offending patch allows me to run and test on XP-Pro.
What do we actually need to create this object in the global namespace?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-10-14 13:48:55 | Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-10-14 13:07:52 | Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? |