Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date: 2008-09-12 16:25:54
Message-ID: 48CA9812.2010301@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> If this were a nice pluggable library I'd agree, but AFAIK it's not, and
> I don't see great value in reinventing the wheel.

I certainly agree.

However, I thought of it more like the archive_command, as proposed by
Hannu. That way we don't need to reinvent any wheel and still the
standby could trigger the base data synchronization itself.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-09-12 16:27:17 Re: Better auth errors from libpq
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-12 16:25:14 Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication