From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
Date: | 2008-09-11 17:07:37 |
Message-ID: | 48C95059.90405@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>> I'm not sure what to do if we need signals sent from processes that
>> aren't connected to shared memory; but maybe we need not cross that
>> bridge here.
>
> Such as signals coming from the postmaster? Isn't that where most of them come
> from though?
Uh.. no, such as signals *going to* the postmaster. That's where we
already have such a multiplexer in place, but not the other way around IIRC.
Regards
Markus Wanner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-09-11 17:31:17 | Re: What is d2mdir? |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-09-11 16:57:13 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |