Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date: 2008-09-11 17:07:37
Message-ID: 48C95059.90405@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>> I'm not sure what to do if we need signals sent from processes that
>> aren't connected to shared memory; but maybe we need not cross that
>> bridge here.
>
> Such as signals coming from the postmaster? Isn't that where most of them come
> from though?

Uh.. no, such as signals *going to* the postmaster. That's where we
already have such a multiplexer in place, but not the other way around IIRC.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-09-11 17:31:17 Re: What is d2mdir?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-09-11 16:57:13 Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication