From: | Ulrich <ulrich(dot)mierendorff(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | More shared_buffers instead of effective_cache_size? |
Date: | 2008-09-04 19:24:18 |
Message-ID: | 48C035E2.3070407@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I have a virtual server with 256 MB of RAM. I am using it as a
webserver, mailserver and for postgres. So there is something like 150MB
left for postgres.
Here are my configs (I haven't benchmarked...)
max_connections = 12 (I think, I will not have more parallel
connections, because I only have 10 PHP worker threads)
shared_buffers = 24MB
work_mem = 1MB
maintenance_work_mem = 16MB
(effective_cache_size = 80MB)
Normally, the file-cache is part of the free ram. But on my virtual
server, it looks like if there is one big file cache for the whole
hardware node and I do not have my own reserved cached, so it is not
easy to find a good value for effective_cache_size.
I've also benchmarked the file-cache using dd (100MB file)
1. Read from HDD:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 8.38522 seconds, 12.5 MB/s
2. Read from Cache:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 3.48694 seconds, 30.1 MB/s
That is really really slow (10 times slower than on my other machine).
What would you do now? Increasing shared_buffers to 100MB and setting
effective_cache_size to 0MB? Or increasing effective_cache_size, too?
Thanks for help.
Regards,
-Ulrich
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-09-04 19:30:34 | Re: More shared_buffers instead of effective_cache_size? |
Previous Message | Matt Smiley | 2008-09-04 18:45:37 | Re: limit clause breaks query planner? |