| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Henry <henry(at)zen(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-09-01 12:00:07 |
| Message-ID: | 48BBD947.2020500@wildenhain.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Henry wrote:
> On Sun, August 31, 2008 10:44 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> The other thing that holds back PostgreSQL right now is a lack of
>> experienced pgsql DBAs and application developers. That will change
>> over time.
>
> And built-in, simple to use, reliable, flexible and fast replication.
> Many a Pg admin or implementer has looked on with envy at what Oracle does
> "out of the box" in terms of replication alone. Yes, there are
Well actually it appears a lot of DBAs are not satisfied with Oracles
"out of the box" solution and buy third party stuff when it comes
to replication. So this argument doesn't really bite.
Regards
Tino
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aaron Burnett | 2008-09-01 12:44:41 | Re: Assistance with SQL |
| Previous Message | Asko Oja | 2008-09-01 11:41:10 | Re: Postgre connect on Postgre |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-01 14:08:56 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2008-09-01 08:31:25 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |