8.3.1 query plan

From: Steve Clark <sclark(at)netwolves(dot)com>
To: pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: 8.3.1 query plan
Date: 2008-08-27 15:00:54
Message-ID: 48B56C26.80708@netwolves.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello List,

I have inherited an existing application. It has a table of events and some events may reference an earlier
event. We have a script that saves the first N number of events for each device, but we also want to save
any additional event that is referenced by one of the first N events. The following query was developed
to do this. It seemed to work ok for a while but one time when it was run it never finished after running
for a day.

So I did an explain and I see it is doing a seq scan in the last sub plan - there are about 375,000 rows
in myevent - why isn't it using the index instead of doing a seq scan?

create unique index indx1myevents on myevents (event_log_no)
CREATE INDEX
vacuum analyze
VACUUM

explain insert into myevents select * from t_unit_event_log a where exists
(select b.event_log_no from myevents b
where a.event_status = 1 and a.event_ref_log_no IS NOT NULL
and a.event_ref_log_no = b.event_log_no and a.event_log_no not in
(select event_log_no from myevents)
)
Seq Scan on t_unit_event_log a (cost=0.00..25863477934.49 rows=645692 width=145)
Filter: (subplan)
SubPlan
-> Result (cost=20019.39..20027.70 rows=1 width=4)
One-Time Filter: (($1 = 1) AND ($2 IS NOT NULL) AND (NOT (subplan)))
-> Index Scan using indx1myevents on myevents b (cost=20019.39..20027.70 rows=1 width=4)
Index Cond: ($2 = event_log_no)
SubPlan
-> Materialize (cost=16579.16..22379.12 rows=432196 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on myevents (cost=0.00..14668.96 rows=432196 width=4)

Why wouldn't the planner use the index instead of doing a seq scan?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Steve

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2008-08-27 15:14:46 Re: loop vs. aggregate was: update and group by/aggregate
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-08-27 14:53:22 Re: Dumping/Restoring with constraints?