| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Date: | 2008-08-20 12:50:27 |
| Message-ID: | 48AC1313.8020508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Asko Oja wrote:
> I do get the impression that Tom who would prefer to get all the pl's
> out of PostgreSQL and live happily ever after with pure SQL standard.
>
>
I have not seen the slightest evidence of this, and don't believe it for
a minute.
I understand some of the frustration you are feeling, but statements
like this don't help anything.
(And yes, I too have recently been bitten nastily by cached plan
problems, and want to see them fixed. I rather like Simon's suggestion
of a command or function that would clear the plan cache.)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-20 12:51:06 | Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-20 12:46:22 | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |