| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Hodges <robert(dot)hodges(at)continuent(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jens-Wolfhard Schicke <drahflow(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |
| Date: | 2008-08-13 07:35:56 |
| Message-ID: | 48A28EDC.8050807@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Robert Hodges wrote:
> I like Simon’s logical vs. physical terminology
So far, it seems to mainly have caused confusion (physical replication,
but logical application? logical replication using WAL shipping?). At
least I still prefer the more meaningful and descriptive terms, like
"log shipping", "statement based replication" or "row based replication".
But maybe, what Simon is about to propose just doesn't fit into any of
those categories. I have a similar problem with Postgres-R, which is
somewhere in between synchronous and asynchronous.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-08-13 09:06:17 | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2008-08-13 05:29:02 | Re: Plugin system like Firefox |