Re: pgScript patch

Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Ok, bad example. But I think you misunderstood the part about
>> "isolation", if that's what you mean with the part about separate.
>>
>> I mean, the vast majority of pgscript will not overlap with th vast
>> majority of pgadmin code. Thus, someone who's "just working on the
>> object tree" for example, will not be affected at all by integrating
>> pgscript.
>>
>> Whereas we should of course integrate them at all points where it's
>> reasonable, because that is likely to give a much better user experience.
>
> What you advocate there sounds to me like it should be integrated in
> the sense that it's part of our codebase, but isolated in it's own
> project and built as a DLL to be used by pgAdmin. Which in some ways
> gives us the best of both worlds, as Mickael could continue to
> maintain the code outside of the pgAdmin cycle, either directly on
> branches of the pgAdmin code, or by working on a copy from which we
> update the pgAdmin tree periodically.
>
> I actually kinda like that idea...
>

I also prefer the DLL idea. Not sure I understand the interest of
pgscript in pgAdmin, though...

--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com