Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint
Date: 2008-08-11 12:50:15
Message-ID: 48A03587.5030709@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Similar is 32/64 bit compilation. It is handled on x86 by MAXALIGN but
> MAXALIGN is same on SPARC for both binaries, but I'm not sure if it
> works correctly.

Are 32/64-bit binaries on Sparc incompatible, then? Does our control
file check catch it? If not, what's causing it, and would the
--footprint switch catch it?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-08-11 13:00:27 Re: proposal: UTF8 to_ascii function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-08-11 12:49:48 Re: Skimming icc warnings on mongoose