Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, jesus(at)omniti(dot)com
Subject: Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Date: 2008-08-01 14:44:45
Message-ID: 4893215D.1040703@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>
>> Applied.
>>
>
> I forgot to mention that I renamed the sort_end probe to sort_done, to
> keep the naming convention. It is a backwards-incompatible change, but
> there were plenty other probes renamed so my guess is that one more does
> not matter all that much.
>
It was overlooked :-( . Good catch!
> Also, it seems I cannot sort pg_trace and pgstat consistently :-(
>
>
Not sure what you're trying to say here!

--
Robert Lor Sun Microsystems
Austin, USA http://sun.com/postgresql

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-01 14:55:04 Re: Fixing the representation of ORDER BY/GROUP BY/DISTINCT
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-08-01 14:43:22 Re: Messed up CVS status of two ECPG files