Re: effective_cache_size is a real?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size is a real?
Date: 2006-07-25 04:13:38
Message-ID: 4851.1153800818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to
> integer)?

Yes --- the planner generally does all that stuff in float arithmetic to
avoid worrying about overflow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 04:26:11 Re: Help! - Slony-I - saving/setting/restoring GUC
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-07-25 04:12:12 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes