Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-08 21:21:50
Message-ID: 484C4D6E.9070000@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Seth,

> My understanding is that the MPP vendors using PostgreSQL and Ingres are
> not *significantly* altering the software other than to, essentially,
> turn off reliance on indexes. They're then adding extensions that are
> proprietary and not, except in the case of GridSQL, open source. Is my
> understanding correct?

Actually, that's incorrect. Greenplum, Yahoo and Netezza all made
substantial alterations to the PostgreSQL code. Greenplum has
re-written the executor and bulk loader, and seems to be on the way to
re-writing the planner entirely. Yahoo and Netezza each pretty much
ripped out everthing except for the parser and a few other bits (Yahoo
kept the Function code, for example), but replaced a majority of the
PostgreSQL code.

I wouldn't classify GridSQL as MPP. It's strictly PP.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-06-09 00:13:43 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-06-08 21:14:26 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives