Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys
Date: 2008-06-05 11:57:27
Message-ID: 4847D4A7.70309@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> pg_dump restore times can be high when they include many ALTER TABLE ADD
> FORIEGN KEY statements, since each statement checks the data to see if
> it is fully valid in all cases.
>
> I've been asked "why we run that at all?", since if we dumped the tables
> together, we already know they match.
>
> If we had a way of pg_dump passing on the information that the test
> already passes, we would be able to skip the checks.
>
> Proposal:
>
> * Introduce a new mode for ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY [WITHOUT CHECK];
> When we run WITHOUT CHECK, iff both the source and target table are
> newly created in this transaction, then we skip the check. If the check
> is skipped we mark the constraint as being unchecked, so we can tell
> later if this has been used.
>
> * Have pg_dump write the new syntax into its dumps, when both the source
> and target table are dumped in same run
>
> I'm guessing that the WITHOUT CHECK option would not be acceptable as an
> unprotected trap for our lazy and wicked users. :-)
>

This whole proposal would be a major footgun which would definitely be
abused, IMNSHO.

I think Heikki's idea of speeding up the check using a hash table of the
foreign keys possibly has merit.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-06-05 12:23:14 Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-06-05 11:08:14 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL