From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-05-30 15:30:14 |
Message-ID: | 48401D86.6030808@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:31 +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But since you mention it: one of the plausible answers for fixing the
>>>> vacuum problem for read-only slaves is to have the slaves push an xmin
>>>> back upstream to the master to prevent premature vacuuming.
>>>>
>>> I think it would be best to not make the slave interfere with the
>>> master's operations; that's only going to increase the operational
>>> complexity of such a solution.
>>>
>
>
>> We ruled that out as the-only-solution a while back. It does have the
>> beauty of simplicity, so it may exist as an option or possibly the only
>> way, for 8.4.
>>
>
> Yeah. The point is that it's fairly clear that we could make that work.
> A solution that doesn't impact the master at all would be nicer, but
> it's not at all clear to me that one is possible, unless we abandon
> WAL-shipping as the base technology.
>
>
>
Quite. Before we start ruling things out let's know what we think we can
actually do.
I hope that NTT will release their code ASAP so we will have a better
idea of what we have and what we need.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-30 15:58:03 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-30 14:46:19 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-30 15:33:35 | Re: Sugestion: xpath |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-30 14:51:34 | Re: Change lock requirements for adding a trigger |