Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq object hooks

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq object hooks
Date: 2008-05-16 15:43:48
Message-ID: 482DABB4.8040104@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest 
>> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it 
>> be marked returned to author for more work?
>>     
>
> So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author
> to revise his work.  I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on
> revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being
> worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying.
>
> Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before
> PGCon starts.  We still have a couple more days to get it done.
>
> 			
>   

Apart from this one only two have not been claimed:

. Map Forks
. TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY

cheers

andrew



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2008-05-16 15:56:41
Subject: Re: Arbitary file size limit in twophase.c
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-05-16 15:31:14
Subject: Re: libpq object hooks

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-05-16 16:59:07
Subject: Re: Fix for psql pager computations
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-05-16 15:31:14
Subject: Re: libpq object hooks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group