| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq object hooks |
| Date: | 2008-05-16 15:31:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20080516153114.GA13885@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest
> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it
> be marked returned to author for more work?
There are still patches open for which no discussion has even started,
so I think this is OK for this commitfest.
(Besides, it seems we're almost there on this patch.)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-16 15:43:48 | Re: libpq object hooks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-16 15:30:05 | Re: libpq object hooks |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-16 15:43:48 | Re: libpq object hooks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-16 15:30:05 | Re: libpq object hooks |