Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Date: 2008-05-07 14:57:18
Message-ID: 4821C34E.8090209@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www

Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> In fact I
> would argue -patches should go away so we dont have that split.

+1 I think the main argument for the split is to keep the "large"
patch emails off the hackers list, but I don't think that limit is so
high that it's a problem. People have to gzip their patches to the
patches list fairly often anyway.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 15:03:59 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2008-05-07 14:53:44 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 15:03:59 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2008-05-07 14:53:44 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 15:03:59 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2008-05-07 14:53:44 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists