Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB
Date: 2008-04-21 15:08:34
Message-ID: 480CADF2.6080901@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
> Am Montag, 21. April 2008 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
>> I compiled postgreSQL with 1kB block size and regresion test fails. Main
>> problem is that output is correct but in different order. See attachment.
>
> This was previously reported:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00901.php
>
>> I think affected test should contain order by keyword.
>
> For previously established reasons, we don't want to add ORDER BY clauses to
> every test that might fail under exceptional circumstances so we test all
> plan types equally. I think very small block sizes are fairly exceptional,
> unless you have a reason up your sleeve why they are a good idea.

I'm only testing behavior with different block size and I think it is not good
idea to support only 8kB for regtest. When 4kB is used then PG fails in Join
regresion test and with 16kB, 32kB it fails because:

*** ./expected/bitmapops.out Fri Apr 11 00:25:26 2008
--- ./results/bitmapops.out Mon Apr 21 15:30:18 2008
***************
*** 20,25 ****
--- 20,26 ----
set enable_seqscan=false;
-- Lower work_mem to trigger use of lossy bitmaps
set work_mem = 64;
+ ERROR: 64 is outside the valid range for parameter "work_mem" (256 .. 2097151)
-- Test bitmap-and.
SELECT count(*) FROM bmscantest WHERE a = 1 AND b = 1;
count

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-21 15:19:03 Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-21 14:50:18 Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB