From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to submit a patch |
Date: | 2008-04-17 01:37:40 |
Message-ID: | 4806A9E4.70103@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> That's why waiting until feature freeze was so awful from my point of view.
> There was never any time left to return patches to the author so Tom ended up
> reworking any patches we really wanted.
>
Some patches went back and forth a few times even after feature freeze.
Many patches last feature freeze seemed to me at least to be of lower
quality and/or higher complexity than usual, and we had a huge number.
Part of the idea behind commit-fest is to avoid that, and so kicking
patches back to the author is more likely to occur, I think.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-04-17 02:18:53 | Re: MERGE SQL Statement |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-17 01:07:35 | Re: How to submit a patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | laser | 2008-04-17 05:37:39 | Re: Can somebody add a link on wiki.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-17 01:07:35 | Re: How to submit a patch |