Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.
Date: 2008-04-13 04:28:36
Message-ID: 48018BF4.7030402@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> I believe the consensus was
>
> * pg_dump and pg_restore should continue to accept -i/--ignore-version
> options, to avoid needlessly breaking existing scripts, but these
> switches will become no-ops; the version check will occur anyway.
>
> * pg_dump should be fixed to allow server minor version greater than its
> own, but not server major version.
>
> Last chance for objections...

None here.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-13 19:18:14 pgsql: Phase 2 of project to make index operator lossiness be determined
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-04-13 03:54:38 CVSROOT: add a global cvsignore know, currently just with objfiles.txt

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Cousin 2008-04-13 08:02:13 Re: Cached Query Plans (was: global prepared statements)
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-04-13 04:21:41 Re: Cached Query Plans (was: global prepared statements)