Re: Index AM change proposals, redux

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
Date: 2008-04-11 16:48:24
Message-ID: 47FF9658.9040600@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Perhaps it would be better to initialize needRecheck to the opclass
> RECHECK flag value? If the consistent function does nothing, the
> behavior is the same as before, but it can flip the flag in either
> direction if it wants.

I have not any objections. In this case (and preparing of rechecking is cheap)
RECHECK flag could be removed.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-11 17:06:09 Re: Cached Query Plans (was: global prepared statements)
Previous Message Tom Dunstan 2008-04-11 16:35:26 Re: Commit fest queue