Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, and Teodor's point about cleaning up the @@@ hack pretty much
> seals the deal for me.
Note that we'll need to add candidate match support to the regular index
scan API as well for that.
> Unless anyone has objections, I will review and apply Heikki's patch
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-03/msg00163.php
> which covers both the amgetmulti return-a-bitmap change and the
> candidate-matches change.
Ok. Thank you!
> (Heiiki, you don't have a later version of that do you?)
Nope.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com