From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: modules |
Date: | 2008-04-03 17:06:25 |
Message-ID: | 47F50E91.2040606@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>
> In fact, this may be the way to deprecate contrib. Start building
> modules and move the contrib packages to it one at a time. That way
> people using contrib have some time to switch and we can point people
> to modules if they are just starting out.
>
> Is there support for this idea? I would like to start exploring this
> if so.
>
>
No. I don't want to deprecate it, I want to get rid of it, lock, stock
and barrel. If you think that we need more than renaming then we can
discuss it, but I don't want a long death, I want one that is certain
and swift.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Svenne Krap | 2008-04-03 17:07:56 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-04-03 17:05:33 | Re: deadlock |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-03 17:06:26 | Re: psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-04-03 17:02:34 | Re: Small TRUNCATE glitch |