From: | Allan Kamau <allank(at)sanbi(dot)ac(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Removing redundant itemsets |
Date: | 2008-03-31 08:18:55 |
Message-ID: | 47F09E6F.5030901@sanbi.ac.za |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks, I have "reworded" the email (replaced "transaction" with
"purchase"). The email has now been sent to the pgsql-sql mailing list.
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Allan Kamau wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I have a plain sql problem (didn't know where else to post it).
>>
>
> pgsql-sql
>
>
>> I have a list of transactions (market basket) ...
>>
>
> Your use of the term "transaction" for a database entity is really
> confusing, and will make it significantly harder for others to
> understand and work with your schema. It might be worth renaming the
> entity to avoid the conflict with the meaning of "transaction" as
> "atomic unit of work" as controlled by BEGIN/COMMIT/ROLLBACK .
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2008-03-31 09:35:38 | Re: Using tables in other PostGreSQL database |
Previous Message | Stuart Brooks | 2008-03-31 08:03:23 | ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong |