Re: Removing redundant itemsets

From: Allan Kamau <allank(at)sanbi(dot)ac(dot)za>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing redundant itemsets
Date: 2008-03-31 08:18:55
Message-ID: 47F09E6F.5030901@sanbi.ac.za
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks, I have "reworded" the email (replaced "transaction" with
"purchase"). The email has now been sent to the pgsql-sql mailing list.

Craig Ringer wrote:
> Allan Kamau wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I have a plain sql problem (didn't know where else to post it).
>>
>
> pgsql-sql
>
>
>> I have a list of transactions (market basket) ...
>>
>
> Your use of the term "transaction" for a database entity is really
> confusing, and will make it significantly harder for others to
> understand and work with your schema. It might be worth renaming the
> entity to avoid the conflict with the meaning of "transaction" as
> "atomic unit of work" as controlled by BEGIN/COMMIT/ROLLBACK .
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2008-03-31 09:35:38 Re: Using tables in other PostGreSQL database
Previous Message Stuart Brooks 2008-03-31 08:03:23 ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong