Re: Integer datetimes

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Integer datetimes
Date: 2008-03-25 08:15:37
Message-ID: 47E8B4A9.3060708@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>>> This is not happening, at least not without 100 times more work than
>>> anyone has shown willingness to put into the issue.
>
>> I understand your arguments, but it is important for in-place upgrade.
>
> No, it is not, you merely need to be sure the new version is configured
> the same as the old ... which is a requirement anyway.

It depends. For example, currently postgreSQL allows only collation setting per
database, but somebody will develop collation per database or column. After that
the situation will be different. Upgrade have to transfer collation from control
file to catalog and so on. Configuration will be different but there will be
possible transition.

Probably all packager will delivery 8.4 and newer with integer datetime, but
people who will use in-place upgrade they will not use official package. I think
it is not good idea.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Smith 2008-03-25 10:57:07 Re: TODO Item: Consider allowing control of upper/lower case folding of unquoted, identifiers
Previous Message mx 2008-03-25 08:00:21 Re: [GSoC] (Is it OK to choose items without % mark in theToDoList) && (is it an acceptable idea to build index on Flash Disk)